Commit ab8e92ef authored by Andrew Morton's avatar Andrew Morton Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] list_del-debug fix

These two BUG_ON()s are redundant and undesired: we're checking for this
condition further on in the function, only better.

Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 1bdfd554
...@@ -59,9 +59,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_add); ...@@ -59,9 +59,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_add);
*/ */
void list_del(struct list_head *entry) void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{ {
BUG_ON(entry->prev->next != entry);
BUG_ON(entry->next->prev != entry);
if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) { if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, " printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next); "but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment