Commit 77391d71 authored by Nick Piggin's avatar Nick Piggin Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] sched: relax pinned balancing

The maximum rebalance interval allowed by the multiprocessor balancing
backoff is often not large enough to handle corner cases where there are
lots of tasks pinned on a CPU.  Suresh reported:

	I see system livelock's if for example I have 7000 processes
	pinned onto one cpu (this is on the fastest 8-way system I
	have access to).

After this patch, the machine is reported to go well above this number.
Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Acked-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 476d139c
......@@ -2030,6 +2030,12 @@ static runqueue_t *find_busiest_queue(struct sched_group *group)
return busiest;
}
/*
* Max backoff if we encounter pinned tasks. Pretty arbitrary value, but
* so long as it is large enough.
*/
#define MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL 512
/*
* Check this_cpu to ensure it is balanced within domain. Attempt to move
* tasks if there is an imbalance.
......@@ -2042,7 +2048,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, runqueue_t *this_rq,
struct sched_group *group;
runqueue_t *busiest;
unsigned long imbalance;
int nr_moved, all_pinned;
int nr_moved, all_pinned = 0;
int active_balance = 0;
spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
......@@ -2133,7 +2139,8 @@ out_balanced:
sd->nr_balance_failed = 0;
/* tune up the balancing interval */
if (sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval)
if ((all_pinned && sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) ||
(sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval))
sd->balance_interval *= 2;
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment