• Alan Stern's avatar
    [PATCH] Hold the device's parent's lock during probe and remove · bf74ad5b
    Alan Stern authored
    This patch (as604) makes the driver core hold a device's parent's lock
    as well as the device's lock during calls to the probe and remove
    methods in a driver.  This facility is needed by USB device drivers,
    owing to the peculiar way USB devices work:
    
    	A device provides multiple interfaces, and drivers are bound
    	to interfaces rather than to devices;
    
    	Nevertheless a reset, reset-configuration, suspend, or resume
    	affects the entire device and requires the caller to hold the
    	lock for the device, not just a lock for one of the interfaces.
    
    Since a USB driver's probe method is always called with the interface
    lock held, the locking order rules (always lock parent before child)
    prevent these methods from acquiring the device lock.  The solution
    provided here is to call all probe and remove methods, for all devices
    (not just USB), with the parent lock already acquired.
    
    Although currently only the USB subsystem requires these changes, people
    have mentioned in prior discussion that the overhead of acquiring an
    extra semaphore in all the prove/remove sequences is not overly large.
    
    Up to now, the USB core has been using its own set of private
    semaphores.  A followup patch will remove them, relying entirely on the
    device semaphores provided by the driver core.
    
    The code paths affected by this patch are:
    
    	device_add and device_del: The USB core already holds the parent
    	lock, so no actual change is needed.
    
    	driver_register and driver_unregister: The driver core will now
    	lock both the parent and the device before probing or removing.
    
    	driver_bind and driver_unbind (in sysfs): These routines will
    	now lock both the parent and the device before binding or
    	unbinding.
    
    	bus_rescan_devices: The helper routine will lock the parent
    	before probing a device.
    
    I have not tested this patch for conflicts with other subsystems.  As
    far as I can see, the only possibility of conflict would lie in the
    bus_rescan_devices pathway, and it seems pretty remote.  Nevertheless,
    it would be good for this to get a lot of testing in -mm.
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
    bf74ad5b
bus.c 16.3 KB