Commit f25181f5 authored by Lachlan McIlroy's avatar Lachlan McIlroy Committed by Felix Blyakher

xfs_file_last_byte() needs to acquire ilock

We had some systems crash with this stack:

[<a00000010000cb20>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x280
[<a00000021291ca00>] xfs_bmbt_get_startoff+0x0/0x20 [xfs]
[<a0000002129080b0>] xfs_bmap_last_offset+0x210/0x280 [xfs]
[<a00000021295b010>] xfs_file_last_byte+0x70/0x1a0 [xfs]
[<a00000021295b200>] xfs_itruncate_start+0xc0/0x1a0 [xfs]
[<a0000002129935f0>] xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks+0x290/0x460 [xfs]
[<a000000212998fb0>] xfs_release+0x1b0/0x240 [xfs]
[<a0000002129ad930>] xfs_file_release+0x70/0xa0 [xfs]
[<a000000100162ea0>] __fput+0x1a0/0x420
[<a000000100163160>] fput+0x40/0x60

The problem here is that xfs_file_last_byte() does not acquire the
inode lock and can therefore race with another thread that is modifying
the extext list.  While xfs_bmap_last_offset() is trying to lookup
what was the last extent some extents were merged and the extent list
shrunk so the index we lookup is now beyond the end of the extent list
and potentially in a freed buffer.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFelix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFelix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
parent 8de2bf93
...@@ -1258,8 +1258,10 @@ xfs_file_last_byte( ...@@ -1258,8 +1258,10 @@ xfs_file_last_byte(
* necessary. * necessary.
*/ */
if (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) { if (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) {
xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
error = xfs_bmap_last_offset(NULL, ip, &last_block, error = xfs_bmap_last_offset(NULL, ip, &last_block,
XFS_DATA_FORK); XFS_DATA_FORK);
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
if (error) { if (error) {
last_block = 0; last_block = 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment