Commit f036be96 authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

printk: introduce printk_once()

This pattern shows up frequently in the kernel:

  static int once = 1;
  ...

		if (once) {
			once = 0;
			printk(KERN_ERR "message\n");
		}
  ...

So add a printk_once() helper macro that reduces this to a single line
of:

		printk_once(KERN_ERR "message\n");

It works analogously to WARN_ONCE() & friends. (We use a macro not
an inline because vararg expansion in inlines looks awkward and the
macro is simple enough.)
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent eda58a85
...@@ -242,6 +242,19 @@ extern struct ratelimit_state printk_ratelimit_state; ...@@ -242,6 +242,19 @@ extern struct ratelimit_state printk_ratelimit_state;
extern int printk_ratelimit(void); extern int printk_ratelimit(void);
extern bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies, extern bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies,
unsigned int interval_msec); unsigned int interval_msec);
/*
* Print a one-time message (analogous to WARN_ONCE() et al):
*/
#define printk_once(x...) ({ \
static int __print_once = 1; \
\
if (__print_once) { \
__print_once = 0; \
printk(x); \
} \
})
#else #else
static inline int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args) static inline int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args)
__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 0))); __attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 0)));
...@@ -253,6 +266,10 @@ static inline int printk_ratelimit(void) { return 0; } ...@@ -253,6 +266,10 @@ static inline int printk_ratelimit(void) { return 0; }
static inline bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies, \ static inline bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies, \
unsigned int interval_msec) \ unsigned int interval_msec) \
{ return false; } { return false; }
/* No effect, but we still get type checking even in the !PRINTK case: */
#define printk_once(x...) printk(x)
#endif #endif
extern int printk_needs_cpu(int cpu); extern int printk_needs_cpu(int cpu);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment