Commit eb78fc39 authored by Darren Hart's avatar Darren Hart Committed by Thomas Gleixner

futex: Correct futex_wait_requeue_pi() commentary

The state machine described in the comments wasn't updated with
a follow-on fix.  Address that and cleanup the corresponding
commentary in the function.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <4A737C2A.9090001@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 11bc48db
...@@ -2133,11 +2133,11 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, ...@@ -2133,11 +2133,11 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* We call schedule in futex_wait_queue_me() when we enqueue and return there * We call schedule in futex_wait_queue_me() when we enqueue and return there
* via the following: * via the following:
* 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue() * 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue()
* 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue and subsequent unlock * 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue
* 3) signal (before or after requeue) * 3) signal
* 4) timeout (before or after requeue) * 4) timeout
* *
* If 3, we setup a restart_block with futex_wait_requeue_pi() as the function. * If 3, cleanup and return -ERESTARTNOINTR.
* *
* If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via: * If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via:
* 5) successful lock * 5) successful lock
...@@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, ...@@ -2145,7 +2145,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* 7) timeout * 7) timeout
* 8) other lock acquisition failure * 8) other lock acquisition failure
* *
* If 6, we setup a restart_block with futex_lock_pi() as the function. * If 6, return -EWOULDBLOCK (restarting the syscall would do the same).
* *
* If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT. * If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT.
* *
...@@ -2264,14 +2264,11 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, ...@@ -2264,14 +2264,11 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared,
rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex); rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
} else if (ret == -EINTR) { } else if (ret == -EINTR) {
/* /*
* We've already been requeued, but we have no way to * We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling
* restart by calling futex_lock_pi() directly. We * futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but
* could restart the syscall, but that will look at * it would detect that the user space "val" changed and return
* the user space value and return right away. So we * -EWOULDBLOCK. Save the overhead of the restart and return
* drop back with EWOULDBLOCK to tell user space that * -EWOULDBLOCK directly.
* "val" has been changed. That's the same what the
* restart of the syscall would do in
* futex_wait_setup().
*/ */
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK; ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment