Commit e823c33c authored by Frans Pop's avatar Frans Pop Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched: keep utime/stime monotonic

sched: keep utime/stime monotonic

cpustats use utime/stime as a ratio against sum_exec_runtime, as a
consequence it can happen - when the ratio changes faster than time
accumulates - that either can be appear to go backwards.

Combined backport for 2.6.23 of the following patches from mainline:
commit 73a2bcb0
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
  sched: keep utime/stime monotonic

commit 9301899b
Author: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
  sched: fix /proc/<PID>/stat stime/utime monotonicity, part 2
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
CC: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
parent 436e61d9
......@@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static cputime_t task_utime(struct task_struct *p)
}
utime = (clock_t)temp;
return clock_t_to_cputime(utime);
p->prev_utime = max(p->prev_utime, clock_t_to_cputime(utime));
return p->prev_utime;
}
static cputime_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
......@@ -366,7 +367,8 @@ static cputime_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
stime = nsec_to_clock_t(p->se.sum_exec_runtime) -
cputime_to_clock_t(task_utime(p));
return clock_t_to_cputime(stime);
p->prev_stime = max(p->prev_stime, clock_t_to_cputime(stime));
return p->prev_stime;
}
#endif
......
......@@ -1022,6 +1022,7 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned int rt_priority;
cputime_t utime, stime;
cputime_t prev_utime, prev_stime;
unsigned long nvcsw, nivcsw; /* context switch counts */
struct timespec start_time; /* monotonic time */
struct timespec real_start_time; /* boot based time */
......
......@@ -1045,6 +1045,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->utime = cputime_zero;
p->stime = cputime_zero;
p->prev_utime = cputime_zero;
p->prev_stime = cputime_zero;
#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT
p->rchar = 0; /* I/O counter: bytes read */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment