x86: Fix assert syntax in vmlinux.lds.S

Older versions of binutils did not accept the naked "ASSERT" syntax;
it is considered an expression whose value needs to be assigned to
something.
Reported-tested-and-fixed-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S

@@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ SECTIONS
 
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
-        "kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE")
+. = ASSERT((_end - LOAD_OFFSET <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
+	   "kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
 #else
 /*
  * Per-cpu symbols which need to be offset from __per_cpu_load
@@ -407,11 +407,11 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_union);
 /*
  * Build-time check on the image size:
  */
-ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
-	"kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE")
+. = ASSERT((_end - _text <= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE),
+	   "kernel image bigger than KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE");
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
+. = ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
            "irq_stack_union is not at start of per-cpu area");
 #endif
 
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ ASSERT((per_cpu__irq_stack_union == 0),
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
 #include <asm/kexec.h>
 
-ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE,
-       "kexec control code size is too big")
+. = ASSERT(kexec_control_code_size <= KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE,
+           "kexec control code size is too big");
 #endif