Commit cdb2cc11 authored by Jean Delvare's avatar Jean Delvare Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

macintosh: Don't assume i2c device probing always succeeds

commit 6f6b35e1 upstream.

If i2c device probing fails, then there is no driver to dereference
after calling i2c_new_device(). Stop assuming that probing will always
succeed, to avoid NULL pointer dereferences. We have an easier access
to the driver anyway.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Tested-by: default avatarTim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Colin Leroy <colin@colino.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
parent 95852f92
...@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ read_reg(struct thermostat* th, int reg) ...@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ read_reg(struct thermostat* th, int reg)
return data; return data;
} }
static struct i2c_driver thermostat_driver;
static int static int
attach_thermostat(struct i2c_adapter *adapter) attach_thermostat(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
{ {
...@@ -148,7 +150,7 @@ attach_thermostat(struct i2c_adapter *adapter) ...@@ -148,7 +150,7 @@ attach_thermostat(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
* Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal. * Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal.
* This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us. * This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us.
*/ */
list_add_tail(&client->detected, &client->driver->clients); list_add_tail(&client->detected, &thermostat_driver.clients);
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
...@@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ struct fcu_fan_table fcu_fans[] = { ...@@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ struct fcu_fan_table fcu_fans[] = {
}, },
}; };
static struct i2c_driver therm_pm72_driver;
/* /*
* Utility function to create an i2c_client structure and * Utility function to create an i2c_client structure and
* attach it to one of u3 adapters * attach it to one of u3 adapters
...@@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *attach_i2c_chip(int id, const char *name) ...@@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *attach_i2c_chip(int id, const char *name)
* Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal. * Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal.
* This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us. * This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us.
*/ */
list_add_tail(&clt->detected, &clt->driver->clients); list_add_tail(&clt->detected, &therm_pm72_driver.clients);
return clt; return clt;
} }
......
...@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int wf_lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, ...@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int wf_lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return rc; return rc;
} }
static struct i2c_driver wf_lm75_driver;
static struct i2c_client *wf_lm75_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, static struct i2c_client *wf_lm75_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
u8 addr, int ds1775, u8 addr, int ds1775,
const char *loc) const char *loc)
...@@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *wf_lm75_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, ...@@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *wf_lm75_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
* Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal. * Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal.
* This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us. * This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us.
*/ */
list_add_tail(&client->detected, &client->driver->clients); list_add_tail(&client->detected, &wf_lm75_driver.clients);
return client; return client;
fail: fail:
return NULL; return NULL;
......
...@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ static int wf_max6690_probe(struct i2c_client *client, ...@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ static int wf_max6690_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return rc; return rc;
} }
static struct i2c_driver wf_max6690_driver;
static struct i2c_client *wf_max6690_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, static struct i2c_client *wf_max6690_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
u8 addr, const char *loc) u8 addr, const char *loc)
{ {
...@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *wf_max6690_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, ...@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *wf_max6690_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
* Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal. * Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal.
* This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us. * This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us.
*/ */
list_add_tail(&client->detected, &client->driver->clients); list_add_tail(&client->detected, &wf_max6690_driver.clients);
return client; return client;
fail: fail:
......
...@@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ static struct wf_sensor_ops wf_sat_ops = { ...@@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ static struct wf_sensor_ops wf_sat_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE, .owner = THIS_MODULE,
}; };
static struct i2c_driver wf_sat_driver;
static void wf_sat_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct device_node *dev) static void wf_sat_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct device_node *dev)
{ {
struct i2c_board_info info; struct i2c_board_info info;
...@@ -222,7 +224,7 @@ static void wf_sat_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct device_node *dev) ...@@ -222,7 +224,7 @@ static void wf_sat_create(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct device_node *dev)
* Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal. * Let i2c-core delete that device on driver removal.
* This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us. * This is safe because i2c-core holds the core_lock mutex for us.
*/ */
list_add_tail(&client->detected, &client->driver->clients); list_add_tail(&client->detected, &wf_sat_driver.clients);
} }
static int wf_sat_probe(struct i2c_client *client, static int wf_sat_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment