Commit b68bb263 authored by David Brownell's avatar David Brownell Committed by Linus Torvalds

rtc: don't return -EBUSY when mutex_lock_interruptible() fails

It was pointed out that the RTC framework handles its mutex locks oddly
...  returning -EBUSY when interrupted.  This fixes that by returning the
value of mutex_lock_interruptible() (i.e.  -EINTR).
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: default avatarAlessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 950d442a
......@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int rtc_read_time(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtc->ops_lock);
if (err)
return -EBUSY;
return err;
if (!rtc->ops)
err = -ENODEV;
......@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ int rtc_set_time(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtc->ops_lock);
if (err)
return -EBUSY;
return err;
if (!rtc->ops)
err = -ENODEV;
......@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int rtc_set_mmss(struct rtc_device *rtc, unsigned long secs)
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtc->ops_lock);
if (err)
return -EBUSY;
return err;
if (!rtc->ops)
err = -ENODEV;
......@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int rtc_read_alarm_internal(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *al
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtc->ops_lock);
if (err)
return -EBUSY;
return err;
if (rtc->ops == NULL)
err = -ENODEV;
......@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ int rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtc->ops_lock);
if (err)
return -EBUSY;
return err;
if (!rtc->ops)
err = -ENODEV;
......
......@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static long rtc_dev_ioctl(struct file *file,
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtc->ops_lock);
if (err)
return -EBUSY;
return err;
/* check that the calling task has appropriate permissions
* for certain ioctls. doing this check here is useful
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment