Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
L
linux-davinci
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
linux
linux-davinci
Commits
b0fd4e49
Commit
b0fd4e49
authored
Jan 31, 2006
by
David S. Miller
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
[SPARC64]: Kill out-of-date commentary in asm-sparc64/tsb.h
Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller
<
davem@davemloft.net
>
parent
30a6ecad
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
8 deletions
+0
-8
include/asm-sparc64/tsb.h
include/asm-sparc64/tsb.h
+0
-8
No files found.
include/asm-sparc64/tsb.h
View file @
b0fd4e49
...
...
@@ -37,14 +37,6 @@
* choose to use bit 47 in the tag. Also, since we never map anything
* at page zero in context zero, we use zero as an invalid tag entry.
* When the lock bit is set, this forces a tag comparison failure.
*
* Currently, we allocate an 8K TSB per-process and we use it for both
* I-TLB and D-TLB misses. Perhaps at some point we'll add code that
* monitors the number of active pages in the process as we get
* major/minor faults, and grow the TSB in response. The only trick
* in implementing that is synchronizing the freeing of the old TSB
* wrt. parallel TSB updates occuring on other processors. On
* possible solution is to use RCU for the freeing of the TSB.
*/
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT 47
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment