Commit a4ea534f authored by Andrew Morton's avatar Andrew Morton Committed by James Toy

fix spellos

Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 6649a41f
......@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
*
* For the menu-tng governor, there are 3 decision factors for picking a C
* state:
* 1) Energie break even point
* 1) Energy break even point
* 2) Performance impact
* 3) Latency tolerance (from pmqos infrastructure)
* These these three factors are treated independently.
......@@ -55,12 +55,12 @@
* menu-tng uses a running average for this correction factor, however it uses a
* set of factors, not just a single factor. This stems from the realization
* that the ratio is dependent on the order of magnitude of the expected
* duration; if we expect 500 milliseconds of idle time the likelyhood of
* duration; if we expect 500 milliseconds of idle time the likelihood of
* getting an interrupt very early is much higher than if we expect 50 micro
* seconds of idle time. A second independent factor that has big impact on
* the actual factor is if there is (disk) IO outstanding or not.
* (as a special twist, we consider every sleep longer than 50 milliseconds
* as perfect; there is no power gains for sleeping longer than this)
* as perfect; there are no power gains for sleeping longer than this)
*
* For these two reasons we keep an array of 12 independent factors, that gets
* indexed based on the magnitude of the expected duration as well as the
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment