Commit 960c65e8 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Paul Mundt

sh: fix xtime_lock deadlocking.

move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
parent 9216f194
...@@ -120,10 +120,6 @@ static long last_rtc_update; ...@@ -120,10 +120,6 @@ static long last_rtc_update;
*/ */
void handle_timer_tick(void) void handle_timer_tick(void)
{ {
do_timer(1);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
#endif
if (current->pid) if (current->pid)
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING); profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
...@@ -132,6 +128,16 @@ void handle_timer_tick(void) ...@@ -132,6 +128,16 @@ void handle_timer_tick(void)
sh_mv.mv_heartbeat(); sh_mv.mv_heartbeat();
#endif #endif
/*
* Here we are in the timer irq handler. We just have irqs locally
* disabled but we don't know if the timer_bh is running on the other
* CPU. We need to avoid to SMP race with it. NOTE: we don' t need
* the irq version of write_lock because as just said we have irq
* locally disabled. -arca
*/
write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
do_timer(1);
/* /*
* If we have an externally synchronized Linux clock, then update * If we have an externally synchronized Linux clock, then update
* RTC clock accordingly every ~11 minutes. Set_rtc_mmss() has to be * RTC clock accordingly every ~11 minutes. Set_rtc_mmss() has to be
...@@ -147,6 +153,11 @@ void handle_timer_tick(void) ...@@ -147,6 +153,11 @@ void handle_timer_tick(void)
/* do it again in 60s */ /* do it again in 60s */
last_rtc_update = xtime.tv_sec - 600; last_rtc_update = xtime.tv_sec - 600;
} }
write_sequnlock(&xtime_lock);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
#endif
} }
#endif /* !CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS */ #endif /* !CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS */
......
...@@ -229,15 +229,22 @@ static long last_rtc_update; ...@@ -229,15 +229,22 @@ static long last_rtc_update;
static inline void do_timer_interrupt(void) static inline void do_timer_interrupt(void)
{ {
unsigned long long current_ctc; unsigned long long current_ctc;
if (current->pid)
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
/*
* Here we are in the timer irq handler. We just have irqs locally
* disabled but we don't know if the timer_bh is running on the other
* CPU. We need to avoid to SMP race with it. NOTE: we don' t need
* the irq version of write_lock because as just said we have irq
* locally disabled. -arca
*/
write_lock(&xtime_lock);
asm ("getcon cr62, %0" : "=r" (current_ctc)); asm ("getcon cr62, %0" : "=r" (current_ctc));
ctc_last_interrupt = (unsigned long) current_ctc; ctc_last_interrupt = (unsigned long) current_ctc;
do_timer(1); do_timer(1);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
#endif
if (current->pid)
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
#ifdef CONFIG_HEARTBEAT #ifdef CONFIG_HEARTBEAT
if (sh_mv.mv_heartbeat != NULL) if (sh_mv.mv_heartbeat != NULL)
...@@ -259,6 +266,11 @@ static inline void do_timer_interrupt(void) ...@@ -259,6 +266,11 @@ static inline void do_timer_interrupt(void)
/* do it again in 60 s */ /* do it again in 60 s */
last_rtc_update = xtime.tv_sec - 600; last_rtc_update = xtime.tv_sec - 600;
} }
write_unlock(&xtime_lock);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
#endif
} }
/* /*
...@@ -275,16 +287,7 @@ static irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) ...@@ -275,16 +287,7 @@ static irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
timer_status &= ~0x100; timer_status &= ~0x100;
ctrl_outw(timer_status, TMU0_TCR); ctrl_outw(timer_status, TMU0_TCR);
/*
* Here we are in the timer irq handler. We just have irqs locally
* disabled but we don't know if the timer_bh is running on the other
* CPU. We need to avoid to SMP race with it. NOTE: we don' t need
* the irq version of write_lock because as just said we have irq
* locally disabled. -arca
*/
write_lock(&xtime_lock);
do_timer_interrupt(); do_timer_interrupt();
write_unlock(&xtime_lock);
return IRQ_HANDLED; return IRQ_HANDLED;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment