Commit 8fd1d178 authored by Pavel Emelyanov's avatar Pavel Emelyanov Committed by David S. Miller

[NET]: Make the sk_clone() lighter

The sk_prot_alloc() already performs all the stuff needed by the
sk_clone(). Besides, the sk_prot_alloc() requires almost twice
less arguments than the sk_alloc() does, so call the sk_prot_alloc()
saving the stack a bit.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 2e4afe7b
...@@ -976,8 +976,9 @@ void sk_free(struct sock *sk) ...@@ -976,8 +976,9 @@ void sk_free(struct sock *sk)
struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority) struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
{ {
struct sock *newsk = sk_alloc(sk->sk_net, sk->sk_family, priority, sk->sk_prot, 0); struct sock *newsk;
newsk = sk_prot_alloc(sk->sk_prot, priority, sk->sk_family);
if (newsk != NULL) { if (newsk != NULL) {
struct sk_filter *filter; struct sk_filter *filter;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment