Commit 8f15b82e authored by Glauber de Oliveira Costa's avatar Glauber de Oliveira Costa Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86: move setup_secondary_clock a little bit down in the function

This is done so we call setup_secondary_clock() in the same place x86_64
does. A separate patch for this is appearantly not needed. But clock
initialization is such a delicate thing, that it's safer to do this way
Signed-off-by: default avatarGlauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 3ff8171f
...@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused) ...@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
*/ */
check_tsc_sync_target(); check_tsc_sync_target();
setup_secondary_clock();
if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) { if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) {
disable_8259A_irq(0); disable_8259A_irq(0);
enable_NMI_through_LVT0(); enable_NMI_through_LVT0();
...@@ -214,6 +213,8 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused) ...@@ -214,6 +213,8 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
unlock_ipi_call_lock(); unlock_ipi_call_lock();
per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE; per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE;
setup_secondary_clock();
wmb(); wmb();
cpu_idle(); cpu_idle();
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment