Commit 7bcb63b2 authored by Michal Simek's avatar Michal Simek

microblaze: Fix put_user macro for 64bits arguments

For 64bits arguments gcc caused that put_user macro
works with wrong value because of optimalization.
Adding volatile caused that gcc not optimized it.

It is possible to use (as Blackfin do) two put_user
macros with 32bits arguments but there is one more
instruction which is due to duplication zero return
value which is called put_user_asm macro.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
parent ea3fd146
......@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ extern long strnlen_user(const char *src, long count);
#define __put_user(x, ptr) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __gu_val = x; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) volatile __gu_val = (x); \
long __gu_err = 0; \
switch (sizeof(__gu_val)) { \
case 1: \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment