udf: potential integer overflow

bloc->logicalBlockNum is unsigned so it's never less than zero.

When I saw that, it made me worry that "bloc->logicalBlockNum + count"
could overflow.  That's why I changed the check for less than zero
to an overflow check.  (The test works because "count" is also
unsigned.)
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

fs/udf/balloc.c

@@ -125,9 +125,8 @@ static void udf_bitmap_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
 
 	mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
 	partmap = &sbi->s_partmaps[bloc->partitionReferenceNum];
-	if (bloc->logicalBlockNum < 0 ||
-	    (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) >
-		partmap->s_partition_len) {
+	if (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count < count ||
+	    (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) > partmap->s_partition_len) {
 		udf_debug("%d < %d || %d + %d > %d\n",
 			  bloc->logicalBlockNum, 0, bloc->logicalBlockNum,
 			  count, partmap->s_partition_len);
@@ -393,9 +392,8 @@ static void udf_table_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
 
 	mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
 	partmap = &sbi->s_partmaps[bloc->partitionReferenceNum];
-	if (bloc->logicalBlockNum < 0 ||
-	    (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) >
-		partmap->s_partition_len) {
+	if (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count < count ||
+	    (bloc->logicalBlockNum + count) > partmap->s_partition_len) {
 		udf_debug("%d < %d || %d + %d > %d\n",
 			  bloc->logicalBlockNum, 0, bloc->logicalBlockNum, count,
 			  partmap->s_partition_len);