Commit 4ce72a2c authored by Li Zefan's avatar Li Zefan Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency

a patch from Henrik Austad did this:

>> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
>> not set.

Peter observed:

> While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
> as to not create an additional ifdef?

Do not declare select_task_rq and some other methods as part of sched_class
when CONFIG_SMP is not set.

Also gather those methods to avoid CONFIG_SMP mess.
Idea-by: default avatarHenrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: default avatarHenrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 0c4b83da
......@@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
......@@ -905,6 +904,8 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
unsigned long (*load_balance) (struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu,
struct rq *busiest, unsigned long max_load_move,
struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
......@@ -916,16 +917,17 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
void (*task_wake_up) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
#endif
void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*set_cpus_allowed)(struct task_struct *p,
const cpumask_t *newmask);
void (*rq_online)(struct rq *rq);
void (*rq_offline)(struct rq *rq);
#endif
void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);
......
......@@ -1593,9 +1593,6 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_fair,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_fair,
.yield_task = yield_task_fair,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
......@@ -1603,6 +1600,8 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_fair,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
.load_balance = load_balance_fair,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_fair,
#endif
......
......@@ -105,9 +105,6 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
/* dequeue is not valid, we print a debug message there: */
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_idle,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_idle,
......@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_idle,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
.load_balance = load_balance_idle,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_idle,
#endif
......
......@@ -1502,9 +1502,6 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_rt,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_rt,
.yield_task = yield_task_rt,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
......@@ -1512,6 +1509,8 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
.load_balance = load_balance_rt,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_rt,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_rt,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment