Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
L
linux-davinci
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
linux
linux-davinci
Commits
418451c1
Commit
418451c1
authored
Feb 06, 2007
by
Ralf Baechle
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
[MIPS] SMTC: remove unused atomic_postclear
Signed-off-by:
Ralf Baechle
<
ralf@linux-mips.org
>
parent
69a6c312
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
22 deletions
+0
-22
arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c
arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c
+0
-22
No files found.
arch/mips/kernel/smtc.c
View file @
418451c1
...
@@ -676,28 +676,6 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_postincrement(unsigned int *pv)
...
@@ -676,28 +676,6 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_postincrement(unsigned int *pv)
return
result
;
return
result
;
}
}
/* No longer used in IPI dispatch, but retained for future recycling */
static
__inline__
int
atomic_postclear
(
unsigned
int
*
pv
)
{
unsigned
long
result
;
unsigned
long
temp
;
__asm__
__volatile__
(
"1: ll %0, %2
\n
"
" or %1, $0, $0
\n
"
" sc %1, %2
\n
"
" beqz %1, 1b
\n
"
" sync
\n
"
:
"=&r"
(
result
),
"=&r"
(
temp
),
"=m"
(
*
pv
)
:
"m"
(
*
pv
)
:
"memory"
);
return
result
;
}
void
smtc_send_ipi
(
int
cpu
,
int
type
,
unsigned
int
action
)
void
smtc_send_ipi
(
int
cpu
,
int
type
,
unsigned
int
action
)
{
{
int
tcstatus
;
int
tcstatus
;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment