Commit 2ddbf952 authored by Hiroshi Shimamoto's avatar Hiroshi Shimamoto Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: clean up sched_fork()

The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing "do
not leak PI boosting priority to the child" at the sched_fork(). This
patch moves the adjusting sched_class from wake_up_new_task() to
sched_fork().

this also shrinks the code a bit:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  40111    4018     292   44421    ad85 sched.o.before
  40102    4018     292   44412    ad7c sched.o.after
Signed-off-by: default avatarHiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent 368059a9
...@@ -1663,6 +1663,8 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags) ...@@ -1663,6 +1663,8 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
* Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child: * Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child:
*/ */
p->prio = current->normal_prio; p->prio = current->normal_prio;
if (!rt_prio(p->prio))
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT) #if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
if (likely(sched_info_on())) if (likely(sched_info_on()))
...@@ -1698,11 +1700,6 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags) ...@@ -1698,11 +1700,6 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
p->prio = effective_prio(p); p->prio = effective_prio(p);
if (rt_prio(p->prio))
p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
else
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
if (task_cpu(p) != this_cpu || !p->sched_class->task_new || if (task_cpu(p) != this_cpu || !p->sched_class->task_new ||
!current->se.on_rq) { !current->se.on_rq) {
activate_task(rq, p, 0); activate_task(rq, p, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment