Commit cdc60a4c authored by Corey Minyard's avatar Corey Minyard Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] x86_64: fix die_lock nesting

I noticed this when poking around in this area.

The oops_begin() function in x86_64 would only conditionally claim
the die_lock if the call is nested, but oops_end() would always
release the spinlock. This patch adds a nest count for the die lock
so that the release of the lock is only done on the final oops_end().
Signed-off-by: default avatarCorey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 5192d84e
......@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ void out_of_line_bug(void)
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(die_lock);
static int die_owner = -1;
static unsigned int die_nest_count;
unsigned __kprobes long oops_begin(void)
{
......@@ -399,6 +400,7 @@ unsigned __kprobes long oops_begin(void)
else
spin_lock(&die_lock);
}
die_nest_count++;
die_owner = cpu;
console_verbose();
bust_spinlocks(1);
......@@ -409,6 +411,12 @@ void __kprobes oops_end(unsigned long flags)
{
die_owner = -1;
bust_spinlocks(0);
die_nest_count--;
if (die_nest_count)
/* We still own the lock */
local_irq_restore(flags);
else
/* Nest count reaches zero, release the lock. */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&die_lock, flags);
if (panic_on_oops)
panic("Oops");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment