Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
L
linux-davinci-2.6.23
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Redmine
Redmine
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Metrics
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
linux
linux-davinci-2.6.23
Commits
b6571da9
Commit
b6571da9
authored
May 30, 2006
by
Dave Jones
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
[CPUFREQ] Remove pointless reinitialisations in acpi-cpufreq
Signed-off-by:
Dave Jones
<
davej@redhat.com
>
parent
83844510
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
1 addition
and
2 deletions
+1
-2
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+1
-2
No files found.
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
View file @
b6571da9
...
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_processor_set_performance (
...
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_processor_set_performance (
{
{
u16
port
=
0
;
u16
port
=
0
;
u8
bit_width
=
0
;
u8
bit_width
=
0
;
int
ret
=
0
;
int
ret
;
u32
value
=
0
;
u32
value
=
0
;
int
i
=
0
;
int
i
=
0
;
struct
cpufreq_freqs
cpufreq_freqs
;
struct
cpufreq_freqs
cpufreq_freqs
;
...
@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ acpi_processor_set_performance (
...
@@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ acpi_processor_set_performance (
udelay
(
10
);
udelay
(
10
);
}
}
}
else
{
}
else
{
i
=
0
;
value
=
(
u32
)
data
->
acpi_data
.
states
[
state
].
status
;
value
=
(
u32
)
data
->
acpi_data
.
states
[
state
].
status
;
}
}
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment