Commit b44df334 authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] s390: bug in setup_rt_frame

Consider return value of __put_user() when setting up a signal frame
instead of ignoring it.

Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 022e4fc0
...@@ -358,8 +358,9 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, ...@@ -358,8 +358,9 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
} else { } else {
regs->gprs[14] = (unsigned long) regs->gprs[14] = (unsigned long)
frame->retcode | PSW_ADDR_AMODE; frame->retcode | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
err |= __put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn, if (__put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
(u16 __user *)(frame->retcode)); (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode)))
goto give_sigsegv;
} }
/* Set up backchain. */ /* Set up backchain. */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment