Commit 7bec08e3 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller Committed by David S. Miller

[SPARC64]: Correctable ECC errors cannot occur at trap level > 0.

The are distrupting, which by the sparc v9 definition means they
can only occur when interrupts are enabled in the %pstate register.
This never occurs in any of the trap handling code running at
trap levels > 0.

So just mark it as an unexpected trap.

This allows us to kill off the cee_stuff member of struct thread_info.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 517af332
...@@ -2169,7 +2169,6 @@ void __init trap_init(void) ...@@ -2169,7 +2169,6 @@ void __init trap_init(void)
TI_KERN_CNTD0 != offsetof(struct thread_info, kernel_cntd0) || TI_KERN_CNTD0 != offsetof(struct thread_info, kernel_cntd0) ||
TI_KERN_CNTD1 != offsetof(struct thread_info, kernel_cntd1) || TI_KERN_CNTD1 != offsetof(struct thread_info, kernel_cntd1) ||
TI_PCR != offsetof(struct thread_info, pcr_reg) || TI_PCR != offsetof(struct thread_info, pcr_reg) ||
TI_CEE_STUFF != offsetof(struct thread_info, cee_stuff) ||
TI_PRE_COUNT != offsetof(struct thread_info, preempt_count) || TI_PRE_COUNT != offsetof(struct thread_info, preempt_count) ||
TI_NEW_CHILD != offsetof(struct thread_info, new_child) || TI_NEW_CHILD != offsetof(struct thread_info, new_child) ||
TI_SYS_NOERROR != offsetof(struct thread_info, syscall_noerror) || TI_SYS_NOERROR != offsetof(struct thread_info, syscall_noerror) ||
......
...@@ -222,23 +222,7 @@ tl1_resv05c: BTRAPTL1(0x5c) BTRAPTL1(0x5d) BTRAPTL1(0x5e) BTRAPTL1(0x5f) ...@@ -222,23 +222,7 @@ tl1_resv05c: BTRAPTL1(0x5c) BTRAPTL1(0x5d) BTRAPTL1(0x5e) BTRAPTL1(0x5f)
tl1_ivec: TRAP_IVEC tl1_ivec: TRAP_IVEC
tl1_paw: TRAPTL1(do_paw_tl1) tl1_paw: TRAPTL1(do_paw_tl1)
tl1_vaw: TRAPTL1(do_vaw_tl1) tl1_vaw: TRAPTL1(do_vaw_tl1)
tl1_cee: BTRAPTL1(0x63)
/* The grotty trick to save %g1 into current->thread.cee_stuff
* is because when we take this trap we could be interrupting
* trap code already using the trap alternate global registers.
*
* We cross our fingers and pray that this store/load does
* not cause yet another CEE trap.
*/
tl1_cee: membar #Sync
stx %g1, [%g6 + TI_CEE_STUFF]
ldxa [%g0] ASI_AFSR, %g1
membar #Sync
stxa %g1, [%g0] ASI_AFSR
membar #Sync
ldx [%g6 + TI_CEE_STUFF], %g1
retry
tl1_iamiss: BTRAPTL1(0x64) BTRAPTL1(0x65) BTRAPTL1(0x66) BTRAPTL1(0x67) tl1_iamiss: BTRAPTL1(0x64) BTRAPTL1(0x65) BTRAPTL1(0x66) BTRAPTL1(0x67)
tl1_damiss: tl1_damiss:
#include "dtlb_miss.S" #include "dtlb_miss.S"
......
...@@ -64,8 +64,6 @@ struct thread_info { ...@@ -64,8 +64,6 @@ struct thread_info {
__u64 kernel_cntd0, kernel_cntd1; __u64 kernel_cntd0, kernel_cntd1;
__u64 pcr_reg; __u64 pcr_reg;
__u64 cee_stuff;
struct restart_block restart_block; struct restart_block restart_block;
struct pt_regs *kern_una_regs; struct pt_regs *kern_una_regs;
...@@ -104,10 +102,9 @@ struct thread_info { ...@@ -104,10 +102,9 @@ struct thread_info {
#define TI_KERN_CNTD0 0x00000480 #define TI_KERN_CNTD0 0x00000480
#define TI_KERN_CNTD1 0x00000488 #define TI_KERN_CNTD1 0x00000488
#define TI_PCR 0x00000490 #define TI_PCR 0x00000490
#define TI_CEE_STUFF 0x00000498 #define TI_RESTART_BLOCK 0x00000498
#define TI_RESTART_BLOCK 0x000004a0 #define TI_KUNA_REGS 0x000004c0
#define TI_KUNA_REGS 0x000004c8 #define TI_KUNA_INSN 0x000004c8
#define TI_KUNA_INSN 0x000004d0
#define TI_FPREGS 0x00000500 #define TI_FPREGS 0x00000500
/* We embed this in the uppermost byte of thread_info->flags */ /* We embed this in the uppermost byte of thread_info->flags */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment